When your biggest fans engage online

(Originally written for Christian Music Broadcasters, February 2020)

I walked into the school gymnasium with my family. The room had been transformed into a food packing plant as Feed My Starving Children set up one of their mobile packing sites. We were signed up to volunteer to pack meals for families around the world. After a brief training and a presentation on how the food will be used, we stepped up to put in an hour or so packing bags of dried “Vitamins, Veggies, Soy, Rice”.

While I know the volunteer labor was appreciated, I couldn’t help but think about how much more efficient it would have been to automate the line, not rely on unskilled workers who put in 1-2 hour shifts, and use a centralized packing facility.

But the reason they used our time had nothing to do with efficiency and cheap labor. We had become a part of the story. We were invested.

It’s the same reason we pack shoe boxes each fall. Our money would go much further if we mailed in a check to a facility that could acquire toys and necessities at wholesale and ship them to kids around the world. But by packing a shoebox, we became a part of a Christmas story.

These organizations have found far more value in getting people actively engaged, than in streamlining their process.

When we allow our listeners to actively participate with us, they become a part of the story of our organization.

Our digital channels are a great place to be intentional about creating “active moments”.

My organization (Northwestern Media) has invested in creating ways for our listeners to engage with our stations in a more active way. From online prayer communities to service opportunities, we have created ways for our users to move from passive consumers to active participants with us. I think we understand that our digital platforms need to be more than just a content channel. But doing so can be messy and can take resources as we manage individual relationships.

Is having actively engaged listeners worth the cost required to manage those users and platforms?

The great thing about digital, is that we have a lot of data! So I dug into ours. Selfishly I wanted to prove that the projects I’m working on lifted donor response. (I know! I’m not proud of that!). I looked at listeners who participated in some of our most active online initiatives, and compare them to listeners who had a more passive relationship with our station.

Our most engaged digital users are 30% more likely to be station donors than our passive listeners.

That had me excited. I was prepared to prove that investing in active listener engagement on our digital channels would lead to increased revenue (so… invest more in digital… my area… right?)

Then I made the mistake of interviewing some of our listeners to dig into this a little more. I was quickly humbled.

When asking donors why they gave, none of them mentioned the prayer community, or the social media channels, or the community volunteering app we had put together. Even though they had all participated in at least one of them. They all spoke about the message, the values, and reflected the core mission and vision of the radio station.

I learned that donations weren’t a result of a highly engaged user. They were a symptom. Donor activity was one of many ways our listener were taking an active role with the station.

Other non-profits have found similar trends. In a study on donor loyalty, Adrian Sargeant and Elaine Jay looked at 20,000 donors to a variety of organizations. They categorized donors as being active or passive in their relationships with the non-profits.  Unsurprisingly, it was the active donors who made up the more sacrificial and reliable portion of an organization’s donor rolls.

Loyalty comes from active participation with an organization. Organizations who actively allow their constituents to participate, will see increased participation in many areas.

The fundraisers among us know the value of taking a donor on a missions trip. Or, allowing a donor to volunteer in our call-centers or events. When they turn thoughts into action, they become more invested in the station.

Creating opportunities for your listener to actively participate with the station, will increase the likelihood that she will participate in other ways. Including donor funding.

  • Be intentional about responding to questions or comments that come in on your social media channels.
  • Build online communities around initiatives your station is doing.
  • Use your digital channels to facilitate real-world action (Volunteering, Drive-thru Difference)
  • Embrace the messiness and inefficiency of allowing your donors and listeners to participate in the work you are doing.

Our listeners don’t give because they are actively participating with us. They give because they believe in our organization and feel connected to its mission. Give them more opportunities to connect.

Why donors give, and how organizations can help

A donor’s motivation to give to a cause is influenced by one or more of the following:

  • A need for personal meaning
  • Financial (tax) benefits
  • Prestige
  • Personal gratitude
  • Public recognition
  • A sense of obligation
  • Personal conviction.

Fundraising appeals need to target one or more of these motivations. However, there are ways an organization can position themselves to compound these motivating forces. These organizational factors can add power to the personal motivation:

  • A good story
  • A sense of urgency
  • Low friction transactions
  • Credibility

For every fundraising tactic, identify the motivator, and the organizational factors at play.





Using demographics in storytelling

When using a story to illustrate a point, be careful with how you use demographic data. Demographics alone can create an “other” view of the issue, and disconnect it from the listener.  Which one of these makes a deeper connection to you?

  • “Poor working women of color”
  • “People having a tough time making ends meet”

Softer identities make a connection.

What does your reader hold as their deepest self-conception? How can that become a part of the story you tell?





Surveys: Test your test

When putting together a customer survey, never underestimate the value of the pretest. If sending the survey to a group, consider starting by sending the survey to 10% of your list first. Take a look at their responses.

  • Did they understand the questions?
  • Were there barriers to their participation?
  • Could the terms in your questions have more than one meaning?
  • Were your answer options exhaustive enough for the user?
  • Were the surveys completed?

Look for all of these answers with a small portion of your survey sample, before the entire sample answers the wrong question.

Test your test





Spotify use has doubled in the last year

A year ago Spotify had 10 Million paid subscribers and 40 Million active users.

At the end of May 2015, Spotify had 20 Million paid subscribers and 75 Million active users.

As they pointed out on a company blog post, that is a new paid subscriber every 3 seconds!

According to the company, that has resulted in $300 Million in royalties paid in the first quarter of 2015.

 





Consumers love social… and media… just not social media.

In his closing rant at this year’s South by Southwest Interactive Festival, futurist and author Bruce Sterling made a comment that struck me.

It was along the lines of:

People love social… and they love media… just not social media.

To the consumer, the medium is of less concern.

People still want to connect with each-other.

People still want to consumer media.

They just aren’t as excited about the concept of social media. I suspect that there isn’t a desire to move away from social media, it has just become such a seamless part of consumers lives that they just don’t give it a second thought.

Increasingly social channels (think snapchat… messaging) are moving away from personal publication, and more towards private, disposable connection.

As a media brand… I need to:

  • Provide more opportunities for consumers to connect with each other and their community.
  • Still continue to provide an authoritative and curated voice, and not worry about becoming a friend.





What I learned from Netflix about A/B Testing

Every user experience (UX) designer wants to be able to know that their decisions are impacting the movement of a user to an interaction. Too often, however, we tend to rely too heavily on our own instinct, and not validate how actually effective the design of the UX actually is.

Todd Yellin is VP of Product innovation at Netflix, and spoke to a packed session at South by Southwest Interaction (SXSW) about the lessons Netflix has learned in 10 years of A/B testing. While the session didn’t dive into any powerful new mechanisms for A/B testing, Yellin did provide a lot of practical examples and advice on how Netflix has used A/B testing to make strategic decisions based on quantified user behavior, rather than design instinct.

What is A/B testing? 

The concept of A/B testing is to simply test design changes toward specific results. The testing often happens with random users with measurements put in place to determine which sample was the most successful in moving towards a defined goal, or taking a specific action.

As Yellin talked through their testing practices, I came to a few conclusions.

1 – Always know what you are measuring toward:

When A/B testing, the Netflix design team always measured against 2 metrics:

  • What impact did this decision have on our user accounts? (If it damaged user retention… if we lost users, it was not a good design decision).
  • What impact did this decision have on user viewing (we have paid accounts… now are they watching more? Increased user viewing was a success)

In some cases, Netflix would identify a tertiary measurement. But it was only put into place after those two measurements were flat.

2 – A/B Testing is the great democratizer

Disagreements come up in the design process. And quite often, the loudest or most senior person in the room will win the design disagreement. Quite often the loudest, or most senior person in the room is the least qualified to make the design decision. A/B testing of your design decisions will allow the users to have a voice at your table. 

3 – Leverage the data you collect (and collect only what you’ll leverage):

Data, Yellin explains, is “Piles of excrement, with a little bit of gold”. Rather than collecting mounds and mounds of user data, they focused on:

  • Age
  • Gender
  • Location

But even then, they increasingly found that Age and Gender were less important than actual viewing habits. Age and gender were demographics, but became somewhat useless for content discovery.

Organizations should determine what data ACTUALLY matters to their user experience, and personalization, and make that data easy to collect. Netflix actually made their key demographic data a part of their credit-card form. They were clear that it was not for credit card purposes, and were transparent on how it would be used. But they realized that making it a part of a larger, already painful, process made it easier to collect.

4 – Don’t listen to your users… watch them…

Yellin shared a real-life example from the Netflix design table. Many passionate users were writing… calling… pleading for the ability to give ratings in 1/2 star increments. To that point, a users could only give 1 – 5 stars. They heard from thousands of users who said the ability to do a 1/2 star rating would really help the accuracy of their decisions.

So…. they tested it.

While the loud users appreciated it, the silent majority did not.

Netflix looked at its core metrics of user retention, and view time, and saw no statistical impact from this decision. This is where they added a 3rd metric. Actually completing the review process. They saw a significant drop in completion of a review process, among those given the ability to do 1/2 star increments. They dropped the 1/2 stars.

5 – The smartest mind at your design table, is still an idiot.

Yellin showed a very specific example of 3 treatments of cover art for the Breaking Bad series. The 3rd option was a very compelling close up of the main character – Walter White. The other two… just weren’t as compelling. Yellin asked the room at SXSW which they though would perform the best. The room overwhelmingly agreed that the compelling face shot of White would win. This is a room of design professionals from around the world.  Yellin said his design team agreed. They A/B(/C) tested the artwork and found that it wasn’t even close. The winner was a far less compelling image of an RV in the desert.

The smartest person on your design team, is still less smart than your user behavior.

Yellin is quick to point out that it isn’t wise to test EVERY design decision. Small incremental changes are probably not worth the investment and potential user frustration to test. There is a point at which designers still need to be empowered to make design decisions in the absence of empirical evidence. But continued testing and analysis of user behavior can help those designers make better decisions when the data isn’t there.

Photo: Flickr: Mike K: CC





Nielsen: How America Listens to Audio

RadioWith growing options in media consumption, even in the audio space, radio still plays a big part in the lives of American consumers.

Nielsen reports indicate that more than 91% of Americans 12+ tune in to radio each week. 

Of note from the report:

  • Radio reaches 90% of nearly every demographic (65+ being the outlier)
  • Surprisingly, the group that makes up the largest generation of radio listeners are millennials (More here) .





You can’t skip this ad

I love it when brands address changes in marketing… within the marketing.

Geico’s new pre-roll spot is short… very short… and addresses the quickness with which we reach for the “Skip” link. But this is one spot you may not want to be so quick to skip…

Wait for it…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvcj9xptNOQ

But wait… there’s more…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSpGEjdIN1Y

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Dvx060Rx3g

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xmzm1JCOqtU